Archive for December, 2008

Are you contractually bound to finish that green card case?

Thursday, December 11th, 2008

DerKevorkian v. Lionbridge Technologies. A case with possible implications for employers who sponsor green cards has just been ruled on by the 10th circuit court of appeals.  DerKevorkian (the foreign national) argued that her employer (Lionbridge) violated its fiduciary duty to her.  She argued that Lionbridge took complete control of the green card process and then mishandled it such that the result was that she did not obtain her green card.  The crux of the problem was a that the PWD came back at nearly twice what her salary was at the time and Lionbridge refused to go forward with the green card case.

The district court judge sided with DerKevorkian concluding that a fiduciary duty was created when DerKevorkian’s long term employer agreed to sponsor her for the green card process and then violated that duty when it was mismanaged and subsequently abandoned.  the district court jury awarded DerKevorkian hundreds of thousands of dollars in damages.

the 10th circuit remanded and now DerKevorkian may lose all of those damages.  Interestingly, the 10th circuit concluded that DerKevorkian had a duty to mitigate.   In the context of this case that means that when Lionbridge offered her a different job (essentially a demotion), with a wage more in line with what they were paying her, she failed to mitigate when she refused it.  The 10th circuit further stated that DerKevorkian’s ultimate goal was the green card and not to work permanently in the job she held at the time.  So if an opportunity to continue on the green card pathpresented itself, even though it was via a different job, her duty to mitigate required she take it.

see:  http://www.hammondlawfirm.com/monthly/Feature_Article/october2007BIMfeature.pdf
for more background on the case history leading up to the district court ruling.

Posted by John Rotterman

 

 

Filing an I-140 more than 180 days after Labor Cert. approved, possible?

Thursday, December 4th, 2008

The Nebraska Service Center liasion has recently clarified that it is possible to file a new I-140 petition more than 180 days after the underlying labor certification application has been approved, but only in those cases where the labor certification had previously been used as the basis for another I-140 by the same sponsoring employer (or its successor-in-interest) and same beneficiary that was filed within the 180 day validity period. This holds true, even if, the first I-140 was denied, provided it was not denied due to fraud relating to the labor certification application. In simple terms, absence fraud, once a labor cert. is filed with an I-140 within 180 day validity period, it remains valid indefinitely for the purpose of filing future I-140 petitions provided it is the same sponsor (or its successor-in-interest) and the same beneficiary applying. (See Neufeld Memo, June 1, 2007).